Lawrence Acker has extensive experience representing natural gas and electric power industry participants in regulatory, commercial, and transactional matters, including infrastructure development, in proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), in civil litigation, and in related appeals. Larry works closely with company counsel and senior executives, as well as experts in related fields of law and other disciplines. He frequently manages the work of groups of lawyers in complex matters.
He has also conducted live, video and webcast seminars within the U.S. and abroad on sources of regulatory and litigation exposure, market manipulation, enforcement and compliance matters, LNG projects and other infrastructure development.
Georgetown University Law Center
Energy: Electricity (Regulatory & Litigation), 2003-2019
Energy: Oil & Gas (Regulatory & Litigation), 2003-2019
"Best Lawyers in America" by Best Lawyers
Energy Law, 2005-2018
Energy Regulatory Law, 2018
Natural Resources Law, 2013-2018
Oil and Gas Law, 2018
Natural Gas & Oil 2017
Legal 500 - Recommended Attorney
Natural Gas & Oil 2017
Energy Regulation - Oil & Gas, 2019
Profiled in Euromoney Guide to the World's Leading Energy Lawyers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
American Gas Association
Edison Electric Institute
Energy Bar Association
Larry has served as lead outside counsel assisting clients with a variety of matters that involve energy regulation, including:
- Appeals of FERC Orders. Recent examples include:
- Challenges in the D.C. Circuit to FERC orders assessing RTEP costs to NYPA (pending);
- Challenges in the D.C. Circuit to FERC hydropower orders respecting federal pre-emption of state regulation (pending);
- Argument, most recently in MRES v. FERC (D.C. Circuit), appeal of FERC orders permitting a Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) to assess congestion costs and other charges to a participant that effectively had been compelled to join;
- Argument in Portland General Electric Co. v. FERC, 854 F.3d 629 (2017); and
- Argument in Ninth Circuit in Idaho Power Co, v. FERC, 801 F.3d 1055 (2015).
- The regulatory and commercial component of due diligence for potential investors in infrastructure projects;
- Negotiation of precedent and other commercial and operating agreements:
- Authorizations for LNG, pipeline, and hydropower projects, some of which have been contested;
- Enforcement investigations and compliance planning;
- Agency evidentiary proceedings; and
- Acting as regulatory counsel in civil litigation in which FERC issues are present.
Larry’s work encompasses natural gas, electric, and hydropower matters. He was lead rate and tariff counsel for the Panhandle Eastern family of interstate pipelines, an active participant in the development of LNG terminals for a variety of companies and investors, regulatory counsel in the multi-party Louisiana coastal wetlands civil litigation against the oil and gas industry, and currently serves as lead FERC counsel for the Hells Canyon hydropower project. He also was lead counsel for more than four years for the power marketers in FERC's California refund proceedings, and related appeals, including presenting oral argument before the Ninth and D.C. Circuits; and he was in the leadership group of the Marketers in FERC's Pacific Northwest refund proceedings, including arguments challenging FERC before the Ninth Circuit, resulting in the remand of FERC’s Orders.
He represented the California ISO in connection with prominent market manipulation matters and to block interference with the ISO’s efforts to prevent load shedding during summer peak periods in Southern California.